• 0161 696 6188
  • Request a callback
Stephensons Solicitors LLP Banner Image

Shaken Baby Syndrome (SBS)

Stephensons has reviewed a number of cases involving Shaken Baby Syndrome (and many other cases of alleged inflicted injuries on babies and young children), we have strong relationships with specialist barristers and medical experts who also have significant experience in this field. This experience is likely to be invaluable to individuals accused or convicted of inflicting serious or fatal injuries on a child. For advice and assistance contact us on 01616 966 229.

This controversial diagnosis consists of a triad of medical symptoms including subdural haematoma, retinal haemorrhage and brain swelling. As the name suggests the diagnosis often leads to a presumption of child abuse (intentional shaking) which can result in the criminal prosecution of the person looking after the child at the time of its collapse. Diagnosis of SBS is more likely when there is no history of accidental trauma or known existing medical conditions.

Excellent4.7 score on Trustpilot
Rated 4.7 / 5 Based on 2158 reviews
Read all reviews

Complex area

Shaken Baby Syndrome is a complex and controversial subject, which attracts significant media attention given that it is often said to be a parent or family member who has inflicted the diagnosed injuries on usually a very young baby.

However, there are many medical experts and legal practitioners who strongly believe that SBS is over diagnosed due to a willingness by clinicians to rely too heavily on the triad as a diagnostic tool. In July 2005 the Court of Appeal heard four appeals of SBS convictions; one manslaughter conviction was quashed, a grievous bodily harm conviction was quashed, a murder conviction was substituted with manslaughter, and a manslaughter conviction was upheld.

Stephensons represented three of the four appellants in the landmark ruling where the Court found that the classic triad is not 100% diagnostic of SBS and that clinical history should also be considered. The Court commented:

"Whilst a strong pointer to NAHI  (non-accidental head injury) on its own we do not think it is possible to find that it must automatically and necessarily lead to a diagnosis of NAHI. All the circumstances, including the clinical picture, must be taken into account".

"Correna is a highly motivated and extremely hard working lawyer.  She cares deeply to ensure that those she represents obtain the best possible outcome."

"Correna Platt is an outstanding performer who is extremely thorough, committed to her clients and brings a very great level of preparation and commitment to the cases she works."

Legal 500

Correna Platt
Correna specialises in serious, complex and high profile criminal cases with extensive skill and experience in helping those facing criminal prosecutions in the Crown Court. View profile

Can people use AI to commit an offence?

The prominence of artificial intelligence (AI) is growing, its services proving useful in many aspects of life. But as we are becoming more accustomed to AI, new uses are being found that don’t always comply with the law. Although AI has been around...

Read more

Understanding non-fatal strangulation: new offence update

It may come as a surprise to some, but non-fatal strangulation was only made into a specific offence in June of 2022 after growing concern that non-fatal strangulations were not being sufficiently prosecuted. This was as a result of its difficulty to prove...

Read more